honestjohn wrote:I love it, in the other driver releases you came down on Nvidia for repeatedly using the same performance increase numbers comparing the 180.xx sets to the 178.xx driver sets. Now they finally update their performance increase estimates and you say they are probably cutting corners and you don't like the sound of it.

Just with that one title. NVIDIA cheats in many games for performance increases so I'm always suspicious when large performance increases come in games where their archaic architecture (in the sense that they prefer brute force over intelligent design. ie. high-speed ROPs over superscalar design) is simply not good enough to run it well. Although not related to shader-heavy games exactly, in Crysis NVIDIA uses only 4 AA samples (8xCSAA) when the ingame AA level is set to 8x, while ATI hardware uses 8 samples (8xMSAA).
honestjohn wrote:Also what else can they say besides "up to"? If they said this instead....
That's nothing against NVIDIA, it's just a pet hate of mine wherever it shows up because I know the real figure is usually far below that

i7 920 D0 @ Stock | 3x2GB G.Skill DDR3-1333 | 640GB WD Caviar Black | GTX 275 | MSI X58 Pro-E | Corsair HX-520